reward and punishment for one's past performance

Mr. A provides value X to Mr. B

Mr. B provides consideration Y to Mr. A

Mr. A finds this activity rewarding.

Under the circumstances.

Third party C felt that "consideration Y is less than value X".

case, Mr. C may refer to this as "rewarding exploitation".

The term "rewarding exploitation" unnecessarily provokes strong emotions.

The "consideration Y is less than the value X" is subjective to the third party C.

It's just a "lose-lose deal" based on subjectivity.

Labeling it "rewarding exploitation" creates the misperception that objective facts exist.

Creates a bias as if "Mr. B is evil" is a fact.

---